<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competitive Pressures: Keeping up with the Spammers &#038; Googlers</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/145/competing-with-spammers.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/145/competing-with-spammers.html#comment-469</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/145/competing-with-spammers.html#comment-469</guid>
					<description>I can totally relate to the getting work done in an emotional driven fury, in fact I am sitting at my desk now waiting for a little inspiration. Thanks for the good honest talk John which is lacking in the SEO communtiy.
Signed,
Extremely Bored with SEO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can totally relate to the getting work done in an emotional driven fury, in fact I am sitting at my desk now waiting for a little inspiration. Thanks for the good honest talk John which is lacking in the SEO communtiy.<br />
Signed,<br />
Extremely Bored with SEO
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/145/competing-with-spammers.html#comment-467</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/145/competing-with-spammers.html#comment-467</guid>
					<description>Yes yes I know a better system will work... not in my experience. And I choose not to keep trying (wasting time). I can scan the headers by eye and see the spam (and see that it is spam) so it's "handled once" and that works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes yes I know a better system will work&#8230; not in my experience. And I choose not to keep trying (wasting time). I can scan the headers by eye and see the spam (and see that it is spam) so it&#8217;s &#8220;handled once&#8221; and that works for me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Xuru</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/145/competing-with-spammers.html#comment-466</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/145/competing-with-spammers.html#comment-466</guid>
					<description>If you are getting false positives on your email, then you aren't using the right system. Do a search for "bayesian filters". It learns. For a few months you check both your inbox and spam box and tell it when it has false positives. Within a month or so, you will get maybe one false positive per 10,000 emails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are getting false positives on your email, then you aren&#8217;t using the right system. Do a search for &#8220;bayesian filters&#8221;. It learns. For a few months you check both your inbox and spam box and tell it when it has false positives. Within a month or so, you will get maybe one false positive per 10,000 emails.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
