<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andy Beal and Google: Think Happy Thoughts</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: johnon.com - John Andrews - &#187; Google Click Fraud Subsidized by AdSense Publishers?</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1899</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1899</guid>
					<description>[...] A Google click fraud employee has posted on his blog a correction of what Andy beal said he said: Yesterday, Andy Beal posted a detailed story on Google and click fraud, in which I was quoted as saying that Google&#8217;s click fraud rate is less than 2%. Did I really say that? Not quite&#8230;.Specifically, I never said that our click fraud rate is less than 2% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A Google click fraud employee has posted on his blog a correction of what Andy beal said he said: Yesterday, Andy Beal posted a detailed story on Google and click fraud, in which I was quoted as saying that Google&#8217;s click fraud rate is less than 2%. Did I really say that? Not quite&#8230;.Specifically, I never said that our click fraud rate is less than 2% [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: xratedpat</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1840</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1840</guid>
					<description>Did someone call Andy Beal a "very skilled online marketer"!?!? He's ******************************************************** sheer incompetence. My friends, if anyone has worked with Beal, or had the ********* experience of being one of his clients as I have, you'd know he is nothing more than a blogging fool! If Andy was a skilled online marketer than ************************************************************. 

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;John Andrews Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; Sorry, but I'd rather my blog was not used to discredit anyone, let alone slander or defame or whatever. I think I left enough up there to show you claim first hand experience as a client, you were not pleased, and you have expressed your opinion, but I thank you for accepting my desire to limit the trash talk and keep on the topic of that Google post. By the way I called Andy Beal a "&lt;em&gt;highly skilled marketer&lt;/em&gt;" out of basic respect because that is my understanding from his reputation. As I said I don't know the man; but I try and start from a base of respect when dealing with all people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone call Andy Beal a &#8220;very skilled online marketer&#8221;!?!? He&#8217;s ******************************************************** sheer incompetence. My friends, if anyone has worked with Beal, or had the ********* experience of being one of his clients as I have, you&#8217;d know he is nothing more than a blogging fool! If Andy was a skilled online marketer than ************************************************************. </p>
<p><em><strong>John Andrews Notes:</strong></em> Sorry, but I&#8217;d rather my blog was not used to discredit anyone, let alone slander or defame or whatever. I think I left enough up there to show you claim first hand experience as a client, you were not pleased, and you have expressed your opinion, but I thank you for accepting my desire to limit the trash talk and keep on the topic of that Google post. By the way I called Andy Beal a &#8220;<em>highly skilled marketer</em>&#8221; out of basic respect because that is my understanding from his reputation. As I said I don&#8217;t know the man; but I try and start from a base of respect when dealing with all people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Andrews calls out Andy Beal &#183; SEO Buzz Box</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1822</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1822</guid>
					<description>[...] John Andrews calls out Any Beal on his click fraud ideas - I will leave this one alone and allow natural selection to take its course. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] John Andrews calls out Any Beal on his click fraud ideas - I will leave this one alone and allow natural selection to take its course. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SEO Buzz Box</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1821</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1821</guid>
					<description>Interesting indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting indeed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: IncrediBILL</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1817</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/194/google-click-fraud.html#comment-1817</guid>
					<description>Andy has become one of the Google pod people, avoid at all costs....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy has become one of the Google pod people, avoid at all costs&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

