Comments on: Does Matt Cutt’s Think Google is Evil, or just Civilized? http://www.johnon.com/212/google-secret.html I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere.... Sat, 18 May 2013 18:50:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Cygnus http://www.johnon.com/212/google-secret.html#comment-2671 Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:54:07 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/212/google-secret.html#comment-2671 That was very straight to the point John; I liked it. The biggest piece, as far as I see it, is the adsense recognition -- it so glaringly obvious by looking at some of the most basic MFA sites not only how much adsense code to expect, but where to expect it...a little tweaking would go a long, long way. Although not as egregious as representing buyer/seller simultaneously, other things that bother me are the lack of validity on basic operators (site:, link:, etc)...some SEOs only go to Yahoo and MSN when they want to see whether recently acquired links are showing up -- that's a bad thing for Google; there's no reason to put out sample or false information, especially if the goal truly is to aggregate and organize the world's information. Cygnus That was very straight to the point John; I liked it. The biggest piece, as far as I see it, is the adsense recognition — it so glaringly obvious by looking at some of the most basic MFA sites not only how much adsense code to expect, but where to expect it…a little tweaking would go a long, long way.

Although not as egregious as representing buyer/seller simultaneously, other things that bother me are the lack of validity on basic operators (site:, link:, etc)…some SEOs only go to Yahoo and MSN when they want to see whether recently acquired links are showing up — that’s a bad thing for Google; there’s no reason to put out sample or false information, especially if the goal truly is to aggregate and organize the world’s information.

Cygnus

]]>