<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I expected Matt to be Smarter than That</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/271/matt-wordpress-spam.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/271/matt-wordpress-spam.html#comment-9798</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 05:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/271/matt-wordpress-spam.html#comment-9798</guid>
					<description>Thanks Matt but I'm not sure I see your point. Is it "sponsored posts" that are bad, or the way it is being "systematized"?  I can see Wordpress.com not signing a deal with a broker, but are you saying sponsored posts are spam? Or maybe just sponsored posts with links are spam? ReviewMe is sponsored PR (no links required). I didn't see any requirement for links in PPP either, although they allow the sponsor to dictate such details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt but I&#8217;m not sure I see your point. Is it &#8220;sponsored posts&#8221; that are bad, or the way it is being &#8220;systematized&#8221;?  I can see Wordpress.com not signing a deal with a broker, but are you saying sponsored posts are spam? Or maybe just sponsored posts with links are spam? ReviewMe is sponsored PR (no links required). I didn&#8217;t see any requirement for links in PPP either, although they allow the sponsor to dictate such details.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/271/matt-wordpress-spam.html#comment-9764</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/271/matt-wordpress-spam.html#comment-9764</guid>
					<description>It's not a matter of money, in fact a company in this space offered a guaranteed 7-figure deal if we supported them and we turned it down. 

I screwed up in this area in the past, and it was a huge mistake, and now companies are forming around systematizing what I already learned 2 years ago was a horrible idea. If anything I'm uniquely positioned to have an opinion on this issue having messed up before, and since then leading web anti-spam with Akismet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a matter of money, in fact a company in this space offered a guaranteed 7-figure deal if we supported them and we turned it down. </p>
<p>I screwed up in this area in the past, and it was a huge mistake, and now companies are forming around systematizing what I already learned 2 years ago was a horrible idea. If anything I&#8217;m uniquely positioned to have an opinion on this issue having messed up before, and since then leading web anti-spam with Akismet.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
