<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New York Times flexes its SEO Muscle</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Irgy</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-130287</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 07:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-130287</guid>
					<description>The New York Times  it's New York Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times  it&#8217;s New York Times.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-129691</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-129691</guid>
					<description>The New York Times definitely needs to change with the times. Newspaper revenue has dropped off substantially and most dynamic news companies or papers are turning to the internet for a bit stake of revenue. Monetising their sites is the new issue and how much they should charge for people viewing their articles. SEO will be integral to these papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times definitely needs to change with the times. Newspaper revenue has dropped off substantially and most dynamic news companies or papers are turning to the internet for a bit stake of revenue. Monetising their sites is the new issue and how much they should charge for people viewing their articles. SEO will be integral to these papers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: indrie anhie</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-129654</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-129654</guid>
					<description>I just came upon this and was wondering if and how this would affect server resources considering that all pages are served dynamically. I might have missed it but what was the reason for generating the pages dynamically? Will caching plugins cache the pages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came upon this and was wondering if and how this would affect server resources considering that all pages are served dynamically. I might have missed it but what was the reason for generating the pages dynamically? Will caching plugins cache the pages?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RH</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-129402</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-129402</guid>
					<description>The traffic for the New York Times will skyrocket if they adopt the approach of using archived content. I believe that newspapers should be going down the same route as most people want to read online (either at work having lunch etc.). The importance though for google is to work out how much content will be listed in the top 10. Otherwise you could see some keywords being dominated by the papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The traffic for the New York Times will skyrocket if they adopt the approach of using archived content. I believe that newspapers should be going down the same route as most people want to read online (either at work having lunch etc.). The importance though for google is to work out how much content will be listed in the top 10. Otherwise you could see some keywords being dominated by the papers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: &#187; Greedy Bastards at The New York Times - John Andrews - johnon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-78788</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/303/nytimescom.html#comment-78788</guid>
					<description>[...] I admired the New York Times for their SEO efforts in the past, and even followed up when some SEO people whined about unfair competition from the New York Times SEO efforts. But now The new York Times is demonstrating the greedy behavior that some of those SEO whiners feared. It&#8217;s not just The Times, but many other newspapers, magazines, and private websites getting to be Greedy Bastards these days. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I admired the New York Times for their SEO efforts in the past, and even followed up when some SEO people whined about unfair competition from the New York Times SEO efforts. But now The new York Times is demonstrating the greedy behavior that some of those SEO whiners feared. It&#8217;s not just The Times, but many other newspapers, magazines, and private websites getting to be Greedy Bastards these days. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
