http://www.johnon.com/352/rel-equal-nofollow.html I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere.... Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:05:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 http://www.johnon.com/352/rel-equal-nofollow.html#comment-38932 Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:16:50 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/352/rel-equal-nofollow.html#comment-38932 Tad - I'm still seeing sites that use nofollow on their internal links - is that paranoia or what? Tad - I’m still seeing sites that use nofollow on their internal links - is that paranoia or what?

]]> http://www.johnon.com/352/rel-equal-nofollow.html#comment-38617 Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:40:06 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/352/rel-equal-nofollow.html#comment-38617 IMHO nofollow is only for links that can potentially be used for spamming. I understand them for comments on blogs and forum posts, but that's about it. IMHO nofollow is only for links that can potentially be used for spamming. I understand them for comments on blogs and forum posts, but that’s about it.

]]> http://www.johnon.com/352/rel-equal-nofollow.html#comment-38596 Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:02:15 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/352/rel-equal-nofollow.html#comment-38596 Stop begging Matt Cutts. He is not gods angel. Just do what you think you would like to do, as if nofollow did not exist. I see sites that use nofollow for all outgoing links! What the heck?! That's crazy. Stop begging Matt Cutts. He is not gods angel. Just do what you think you would like to do, as if nofollow did not exist. I see sites that use nofollow for all outgoing links! What the heck?! That’s crazy.

]]>