Comments on: Can Google Kill Off SEO? http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere.... Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:54:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Anne Zinta http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-128009 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:23:42 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-128009 I don't think Google hates SEO infact they are the first search engine people to clarify some of the facts pertaining to gaining positive results in SEO process. I don’t think Google hates SEO infact they are the first search engine people to clarify some of the facts pertaining to gaining positive results in SEO process.

]]> by: Does Google really hate Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-112763 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 03:14:01 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-112763 [...] others being more stealthy. However during a recent post by John Andrews (www.johnon.com), called ‘Can Google kill off SEO’. In the article John Andrews [...] […] others being more stealthy. However during a recent post by John Andrews (www.johnon.com), called ‘Can Google kill off SEO’. In the article John Andrews […]

]]> by: Ex-NetSol Guy http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-40283 Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:41:22 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-40283 I got started in SEO doing it for Network Solutions and just to clarify-- we weren't offshore resources :) We were located in the heartland-- and I knew enough before I started to realize that what they wanted us to do was not SEO. I am not exactly sure what it was. Your 29.99 a month or whatever got you 1 hour consultation and if you were lucky enough to get it with me I had package as useful of an hour as I could get. Though, frankly, people were always highly upset when I told them they needed to change things on their site. People paying NetSol for SEO didn't want SEO they wanted magic. I got started in SEO doing it for Network Solutions and just to clarify– we weren’t offshore resources :) We were located in the heartland– and I knew enough before I started to realize that what they wanted us to do was not SEO. I am not exactly sure what it was. Your 29.99 a month or whatever got you 1 hour consultation and if you were lucky enough to get it with me I had package as useful of an hour as I could get. Though, frankly, people were always highly upset when I told them they needed to change things on their site. People paying NetSol for SEO didn’t want SEO they wanted magic.

]]> by: Jill http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-40203 Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:17:43 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-40203 I agree that Google hates SEOS. But I also think it's a good idea for them not to label the supplemental results. I can't believe it took them this long. Maybe we can stop getting all the stupid "why are my usless pages in the supplemental results" questions over at my forum... I agree that Google hates SEOS.

But I also think it’s a good idea for them not to label the supplemental results. I can’t believe it took them this long. Maybe we can stop getting all the stupid “why are my usless pages in the supplemental results” questions over at my forum…

]]> by: Marios Alexandrou http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-40161 Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:45:57 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/368/goole-hates-seo.html#comment-40161 I don't think Google hates search engine optimizers. My perspective is that a good number of us are evangelizing practices that make it easier for search engines to decipher the topic of a page and then to rank that content appropriately. We're free labor for Google. In exchange for that free work Google has to put up with attempts at manipulation, but as long as their results are mostly good, they'll do just fine. I don’t think Google hates search engine optimizers. My perspective is that a good number of us are evangelizing practices that make it easier for search engines to decipher the topic of a page and then to rank that content appropriately. We’re free labor for Google. In exchange for that free work Google has to put up with attempts at manipulation, but as long as their results are mostly good, they’ll do just fine.

]]>