Comments on: Time to Coin an SEO Phrase? Tight Pages http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere.... Fri, 24 May 2013 18:41:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: » Go Google Go! - John Andrews - johnon.com http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-82991 Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:32:38 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-82991 [...] I speak from the viewpoint of publisher here. Today’s Google is way beyond the text engine of yesteryear now, and much smoother than the early LSI stuff we played with in ‘03. If you’ve been writing off 3+ term searches as “long tail” you should take another look at your logs today. I’m seeing highly relevant combination queries which clearly reflect user intent, ranking my theme-targeting pages with dead-on precision. If users haven’t adopted the “say more so we better understand your intent” method of searching, they will when they get used to this performance. It’s rewarding. Yeah, it’ll be tough to define what your “target terms” are going forward, but I’ve been singing that tune for a year at least already. The future of SEO is relevance, and there’s no avoiding it. The key is defining relevance, and understanding the Google’s approach to rewarding it. remember, folks. WE define relevance, not Google ;-) [...] […] I speak from the viewpoint of publisher here. Today’s Google is way beyond the text engine of yesteryear now, and much smoother than the early LSI stuff we played with in ‘03. If you’ve been writing off 3+ term searches as “long tail” you should take another look at your logs today. I’m seeing highly relevant combination queries which clearly reflect user intent, ranking my theme-targeting pages with dead-on precision. If users haven’t adopted the “say more so we better understand your intent” method of searching, they will when they get used to this performance. It’s rewarding. Yeah, it’ll be tough to define what your “target terms” are going forward, but I’ve been singing that tune for a year at least already. The future of SEO is relevance, and there’s no avoiding it. The key is defining relevance, and understanding the Google’s approach to rewarding it. remember, folks. WE define relevance, not Google ;-) […]

]]> by: Sujan Patel http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-43014 Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:43:54 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-43014 Good luck coining the tearm tight places Good luck coining the tearm tight places

]]> by: share.websitemagazine.com http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-42972 Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:48:08 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-42972 <strong>» Time to Coin an SEO Phrase? Tight Pages...</strong> A web page has topical content. A web page with a lot of additional, off-topic content is “bloated“. A web page full of rich content or too much content is “heavy“.... » Time to Coin an SEO Phrase? Tight Pages…

A web page has topical content. A web page with a lot of additional, off-topic content is “bloated“. A web page full of rich content or too much content is “heavy“….

]]> by: Susan http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-42947 Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:59:15 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-42947 How about "fit" How about “fit”

]]> by: Deano http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-42805 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:59:57 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/377/google-lsi-tight.html#comment-42805 works for me too --- "Tight" is TIGHT! works for me too — “Tight” is TIGHT!

]]>