<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg&#8217;s Got Nothin&#8217; on Sphinn</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-48544</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 06:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-48544</guid>
					<description>I too am a member of sphinn, but I have to wonder if all these content driven networking sites are not click-clique driven?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am a member of sphinn, but I have to wonder if all these content driven networking sites are not click-clique driven?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin Muehl</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-43112</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-43112</guid>
					<description>I wonder who's the 2nd most prominent? Danny - ??? - Rand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder who&#8217;s the 2nd most prominent? Danny - ??? - Rand
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tamarr Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-43067</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-43067</guid>
					<description>Good points, John.  For me, a healthy blend of Digg   Sphinn make my world spin, but to each his own.  I'm much prouder of the Sphinn community in many respects; it is a lot more welcoming and consequently is a more enjoyable place to be.  But I like the odd news and tech stories that drive Digg's success, so I can't see myself avoiding Digg just yet.  I'm sure you probably saw my &lt;A href="http://www.techipedia.com/2007/11-digg-tips/"&gt;my Digg post&lt;/a&gt; that I published today.  

I do believe, however, that the evolution of vertical Digg/Sphinn sites is the way to go.  It was something Todd Malicoat and Neil Patel predicted months ago in a WebProNews interview.  It's happening, and in Sphinn's case, it's highly successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, John.  For me, a healthy blend of Digg   Sphinn make my world spin, but to each his own.  I&#8217;m much prouder of the Sphinn community in many respects; it is a lot more welcoming and consequently is a more enjoyable place to be.  But I like the odd news and tech stories that drive Digg&#8217;s success, so I can&#8217;t see myself avoiding Digg just yet.  I&#8217;m sure you probably saw my <a href="http://www.techipedia.com/2007/11-digg-tips/">my Digg post</a> that I published today.  </p>
<p>I do believe, however, that the evolution of vertical Digg/Sphinn sites is the way to go.  It was something Todd Malicoat and Neil Patel predicted months ago in a WebProNews interview.  It&#8217;s happening, and in Sphinn&#8217;s case, it&#8217;s highly successful.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd Mintz</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-43065</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-43065</guid>
					<description>You earned your bragging rights...congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You earned your bragging rights&#8230;congrats!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-43052</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/383/sphinn-digg.html#comment-43052</guid>
					<description>Right on, John.  I think vertical social media websites are certainly the way to go.  Perhaps that's the next online property that could succeed incredibly well.  A home for vertical social media websites.  It should make it very easy to set up your own social media website with all the functionality you need to have long-term success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, John.  I think vertical social media websites are certainly the way to go.  Perhaps that&#8217;s the next online property that could succeed incredibly well.  A home for vertical social media websites.  It should make it very easy to set up your own social media website with all the functionality you need to have long-term success.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
