<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Healthcare Search Marketing and C-Ego Ranking</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: &#187; Keas.com - another bad domain name - John Andrews - johnon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-129341</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-129341</guid>
					<description>[...] locking up a community and keeping them away from searching for themselves. Rather than rely on healthcare search marketing, the business of reaching consumers who need need specific health information by appearing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] locking up a community and keeping them away from searching for themselves. Rather than rely on healthcare search marketing, the business of reaching consumers who need need specific health information by appearing [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Whitby</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-129061</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-129061</guid>
					<description>The phrases "healthcare search marketing" gets very little search each month in Google anyway, so i realy dont see the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrases &#8220;healthcare search marketing&#8221; gets very little search each month in Google anyway, so i realy dont see the point.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Flashy flashy</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-96548</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-96548</guid>
					<description>Yours' ranks third for the keyword "Healthcare search marketing".Hurray...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yours&#8217; ranks third for the keyword &#8220;Healthcare search marketing&#8221;.Hurray&#8230;!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-53691</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-53691</guid>
					<description>I had to jump in here for two reasons. In reference to your comment about the search firms ranking for terms like "healthcare search marketing", contrary to making your point, we at Catalyst actually are a search marketing firm that specializes in healthcare. Therefore, not only do we target "healthcare search marketing" but we've attracted business this way. Secondly, I could not agree with you more that companies everywhere are getting duped by firms claiming they know search. And that's a bummer. Catalyst clients rank for highly competitive keyphrases like hypertension, overavtive bladder, herpes, etc.  Every keyphrase strategy includes high volume, highly competitve condition and symtom keyphrases. Unfortunately, to many marketing managers neglect to do their homework when choosing a competent and reliable search marketing partner.Thanks for the post, good food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to jump in here for two reasons. In reference to your comment about the search firms ranking for terms like &#8220;healthcare search marketing&#8221;, contrary to making your point, we at Catalyst actually are a search marketing firm that specializes in healthcare. Therefore, not only do we target &#8220;healthcare search marketing&#8221; but we&#8217;ve attracted business this way. Secondly, I could not agree with you more that companies everywhere are getting duped by firms claiming they know search. And that&#8217;s a bummer. Catalyst clients rank for highly competitive keyphrases like hypertension, overavtive bladder, herpes, etc.  Every keyphrase strategy includes high volume, highly competitve condition and symtom keyphrases. Unfortunately, to many marketing managers neglect to do their homework when choosing a competent and reliable search marketing partner.Thanks for the post, good food for thought.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-53268</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/407/healthcare-search-marketing.html#comment-53268</guid>
					<description>2 days to #2 in Google for "healthcare search marketing". 

@Marshall. I agree that would be tougher :-)
I'll save that work for a &lt;a href="http://www.UpperLeftPlacement.com" title="pharmaceutical marketing"&gt;pharmaceutical marketing firm&lt;/a&gt; web site, where the efforts would be worthwhile. 

I will say that if you're after page 1 for that term, it's shame you have to compete with this page http://sciencedaily.mediwire.com/main/default.aspx?p=pharmaceutical_marketing
and this page http://www.healthyskepticism.org/. They represent two "marketing tactics" which in my opinion pollute Google, but are regrettably valid approaches to search marketing as a consequence of their effectiveness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 days to #2 in Google for &#8220;healthcare search marketing&#8221;. </p>
<p>@Marshall. I agree that would be tougher :-)<br />
I&#8217;ll save that work for a <a href="http://www.UpperLeftPlacement.com" title="pharmaceutical marketing">pharmaceutical marketing firm</a> web site, where the efforts would be worthwhile. </p>
<p>I will say that if you&#8217;re after page 1 for that term, it&#8217;s shame you have to compete with this page <a href="http://sciencedaily.mediwire.com/main/default.aspx?p=pharmaceutical_marketing" >http://sciencedaily.mediwire.com/main/default.aspx?p=pharmaceutical_marketing</a><br />
and this page <a href="http://www.healthyskepticism.org/." >http://www.healthyskepticism.org/.</a> They represent two &#8220;marketing tactics&#8221; which in my opinion pollute Google, but are regrettably valid approaches to search marketing as a consequence of their effectiveness.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
