<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SEO, the Press, and Pandering</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Google - All 2008 Nominees &#187; SEMMYS.org</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-84200</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-84200</guid>
					<description>[...] The SEO, the Press, and Pandering John Andrews &#124; 11/3/07 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The SEO, the Press, and Pandering John Andrews | 11/3/07 [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: November &#8216;07: Best Search/Marketing Posts &#187; Small Business SEM</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-68875</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-68875</guid>
					<description>[...] John Andrews: The SEO, the Press, and Pandering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] John Andrews: The SEO, the Press, and Pandering [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: massa</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-63909</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-63909</guid>
					<description>There's no such thing as bad press. But that doesn't change the fact that sensational sells papers. 

same as it ever was. it's a sick world -- thank god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no such thing as bad press. But that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that sensational sells papers. </p>
<p>same as it ever was. it&#8217;s a sick world &#8212; thank god.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: What Your Mama Didn&#8217;t Tell You About Becoming an SEO Consultant - Cape Cod SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-63222</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-63222</guid>
					<description>[...] Thanks to John Andrews for writing his post on SEO, The Press and Pandering, which made me sit back and reflect more on how our industry is evolving and being perceived.  Sphere ItShare and Enjoy! Your Votes Are Appreciated. del.icio.us &#124; Digg it &#124; Reddit &#124; StumbleUpon &#124; Sphinn it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Thanks to John Andrews for writing his post on SEO, The Press and Pandering, which made me sit back and reflect more on how our industry is evolving and being perceived.  Sphere ItShare and Enjoy! Your Votes Are Appreciated. del.icio.us | Digg it | Reddit | StumbleUpon | Sphinn it [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-61616</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/429/seo-pandering.html#comment-61616</guid>
					<description>GREAT post John - very well put together and well thought out.

If not for ethical and strong SEO - search engines would return junk a fair amount of the time, even Google at that. But what do they care; they can return whatever they want, it's their engine...display well titled pages, and put a bunch of advertising around it, the clicks will come. OR, better yet, just insert Wikipedia.

Google really seems to be on a tear against SEO's, dark, gray or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT post John - very well put together and well thought out.</p>
<p>If not for ethical and strong SEO - search engines would return junk a fair amount of the time, even Google at that. But what do they care; they can return whatever they want, it&#8217;s their engine&#8230;display well titled pages, and put a bunch of advertising around it, the clicks will come. OR, better yet, just insert Wikipedia.</p>
<p>Google really seems to be on a tear against SEO&#8217;s, dark, gray or whatever.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

