Comments on: Shhh.. It’s Not Advertising, It’s Wikipedia!

by: Spielautomaten Führer

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:26:27 +0000

Now back to Wikipedia. I’m a big fan of several of the “back to Mine” groove CDs, having appreciated them since the dawn of the Back-to-Mine concept many years ago. I was exploring drum & bass in the clubs of Vancouver, experiencing what became “vibe” and “groove” and “chill” when I discovered asian underground and my first Back To Mine collections.Thanks for commenting, Lee. I completely agree with you (hadn’t thought about the sabotage thing) and really it’s all about Google at this point. After all, what is the point of promotion if it is counter productive for search marketing? We’re all building publications and Google says it wants to organize it for us.

by: SisterSledge

Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:44:51 +0000

hmmm…too bad PanMe.com, RoastMe.com and FryMe.com are all taken. SauteMe.com is available but it just doesn’t have the right ring. TellMeWhyISuck.com IS available…for the moment ;-p

by: Dan Perry

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:13:56 +0000

So following your train of thought that negative comments (and taking it one step forward, negative articles) will be the only valid links left online, I’d say that you’re seting yourself up pretty nicely for a very link-worthy future online.

ZINGGG!!!!!!

P.S. I’m at the Hilton too, and I’d be happy to buy you a drink. This is my style of writing (Oops; positive comment. Oh well, I wasn’t expecting a do-follow on that URL anyway)

John replies: hah hah hadn’t anticipated that! Sort of turns the ReviewMe business model upside down. maybe PanMe.com?

by: Lee Odden

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:07:08 +0000

I hear you John. Is the big G getting too big, too controlling maybe?

by: Andrej

Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:21:00 +0000

your Talvin Singh link links out to Underworld on Wikipedia.

** Fixed it Andrej, thanks.