<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Content Widgets, by Family Guy Guy</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/579/sponsoredbygoogle.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Bliss</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/579/sponsoredbygoogle.html#comment-127955</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/579/sponsoredbygoogle.html#comment-127955</guid>
					<description>John - 

I was at a small gathering about 6 months ago where the big three all presented, and Google was the only one who presented themselves as an ad agency - 

As far as creating original and unique content, that's most likely the only way to get any leverage on Google - they have the exposure, but the creator has the "stuff" Google wants.

now if I could only get that scraped stuff into my MFA sites... ;-O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John - </p>
<p>I was at a small gathering about 6 months ago where the big three all presented, and Google was the only one who presented themselves as an ad agency - </p>
<p>As far as creating original and unique content, that&#8217;s most likely the only way to get any leverage on Google - they have the exposure, but the creator has the &#8220;stuff&#8221; Google wants.</p>
<p>now if I could only get that scraped stuff into my MFA sites&#8230; ;-O
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
