<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times trashes AOL Brand</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: J Boyer Morristown NJ</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html#comment-128319</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html#comment-128319</guid>
					<description>I would be slightly interested in what AOL's demographics are now.  As far as the NY times goes, I don't read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be slightly interested in what AOL&#8217;s demographics are now.  As far as the NY times goes, I don&#8217;t read it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gab Goldenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html#comment-128270</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html#comment-128270</guid>
					<description>Clicked that box, but it was above the search results, not to the right. Apparently they've out-competed the SEM competition for New York Times ;).

But... the ppc-to-cpm arbitrage still was probably profitable to them, as I generated two page views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clicked that box, but it was above the search results, not to the right. Apparently they&#8217;ve out-competed the SEM competition for New York Times ;).</p>
<p>But&#8230; the ppc-to-cpm arbitrage still was probably profitable to them, as I generated two page views.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Demerzel</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html#comment-128248</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html#comment-128248</guid>
					<description>I used to say 10 years ago that if you still had AOL back &lt;i&gt;then&lt;/i&gt;, you were either 1) an idiot, 2) had no real knowledge of the Internet, or 3) stuck on your parent's service.

Would be interesting to see what their demographics are though nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to say 10 years ago that if you still had AOL back <i>then</i>, you were either 1) an idiot, 2) had no real knowledge of the Internet, or 3) stuck on your parent&#8217;s service.</p>
<p>Would be interesting to see what their demographics are though nowadays.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gamermk</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html#comment-128247</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/611/nytimes-trashes-aol.html#comment-128247</guid>
					<description>Hehe... nice, subtle agenda yourself their John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe&#8230; nice, subtle agenda yourself their John.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
