<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruining the Web: Google is Responsible and Capable</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: J Boyer Morristown NJ</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128682</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128682</guid>
					<description>Good god, I had never even heard of Google local or of people doing this in this way to get rankings.  Wonder when google will catch on to this practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good god, I had never even heard of Google local or of people doing this in this way to get rankings.  Wonder when google will catch on to this practice.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Willy Finebloom</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128629</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128629</guid>
					<description>John, You didn't say anything about all the link building process. People spam the internet with links, to increase their pagerank...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, You didn&#8217;t say anything about all the link building process. People spam the internet with links, to increase their pagerank&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128610</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128610</guid>
					<description>John, here is something that kinda relates.. check out this valley wag post:
http://valleywag.gawker.com/5157039/the-height-of-googles-hubris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, here is something that kinda relates.. check out this valley wag post:<br />
<a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5157039/the-height-of-googles-hubris" >http://valleywag.gawker.com/5157039/the-height-of-googles-hubris</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128606</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128606</guid>
					<description>"OpenID is the solution to fake reviews. It’s not… and it represents a GREAT way for companies like Google to control even more of your access and perspective on the cesspool of the web" - can you expand on this John, how exactly will google benefit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;OpenID is the solution to fake reviews. It’s not… and it represents a GREAT way for companies like Google to control even more of your access and perspective on the cesspool of the web&#8221; - can you expand on this John, how exactly will google benefit?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128560</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/644/fake-reviews-cesspool.html#comment-128560</guid>
					<description>Google definitely does shape the way the web works. Being that I work in SEO I have a lot of respect and understanding for what Google does but I still like to see options. But the honest truth is no-one has been able to do it better. Cule tried and failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google definitely does shape the way the web works. Being that I work in SEO I have a lot of respect and understanding for what Google does but I still like to see options. But the honest truth is no-one has been able to do it better. Cule tried and failed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
