<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Armchair Quarterbacks, SEOs, and Domainers</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Reuben Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128751</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128751</guid>
					<description>Google is keenly watching whats going on, where as I would like to use domain that pretty of its full capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is keenly watching whats going on, where as I would like to use domain that pretty of its full capacity.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mobiel internet prepay</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128746</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128746</guid>
					<description>I would always use a domain that pretty to it's full capacity... And that would be building a great website on it, not 301'ing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would always use a domain that pretty to it&#8217;s full capacity&#8230; And that would be building a great website on it, not 301&#8242;ing it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Promotif</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128742</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128742</guid>
					<description>If we all only had such problems to worry about. :)  They probably could have made better use of the domain than just a 301 in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we all only had such problems to worry about. :)  They probably could have made better use of the domain than just a 301 in my opinion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Domainer</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128740</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128740</guid>
					<description>This is very true.  The reality of buying and selling domains is totally different from what many people perceive.  It is actually quite hard to sell a domain, even if its a quality generic name.  So you armchair domainers, get your domains on Sedo and lets see you sell them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very true.  The reality of buying and selling domains is totally different from what many people perceive.  It is actually quite hard to sell a domain, even if its a quality generic name.  So you armchair domainers, get your domains on Sedo and lets see you sell them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spondishy</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128738</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/656/toys-seo.html#comment-128738</guid>
					<description>Have they wasted toys . com by 301'ing it? Maybe, but one thing is for sure, they stopped a competitor going for no 1 with that domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have they wasted toys . com by 301&#8242;ing it? Maybe, but one thing is for sure, they stopped a competitor going for no 1 with that domain.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
