<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engines want to Eliminate Domain Names</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ubezpieczenia</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-129202</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-129202</guid>
					<description>I don't agree with it. I think that domain name (and url) is like a "Brandmark" of each site. Everyone whant to be reminded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with it. I think that domain name (and url) is like a &#8220;Brandmark&#8221; of each site. Everyone whant to be reminded.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: deleted</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-129123</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-129123</guid>
					<description>I don't think this is such good idea after all. I think that the best thing for search engines is to give people as many changes to advertise their sites and blogs as it is possible. The more elements and tools will be available for website owners the more money could search engines achieve. I think that search engines could earn more with not only commercials poping out of the screen but with more payed commercials. One or two of many kind could appear in results of any topic - the price of such commercial could be even ridiculously cheap, and based on search results of keyword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is such good idea after all. I think that the best thing for search engines is to give people as many changes to advertise their sites and blogs as it is possible. The more elements and tools will be available for website owners the more money could search engines achieve. I think that search engines could earn more with not only commercials poping out of the screen but with more payed commercials. One or two of many kind could appear in results of any topic - the price of such commercial could be even ridiculously cheap, and based on search results of keyword.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay Tani kredyt</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-129029</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-129029</guid>
					<description>That's an interesting article. Defenitely domains as search will gradually be marginalized, though I think that they'll never be completely eliminated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting article. Defenitely domains as search will gradually be marginalized, though I think that they&#8217;ll never be completely eliminated.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-128985</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-128985</guid>
					<description>Sorry. Ain't gonna happen.

When I want IBM's website, I will ALWAYS type ibm.com into the url box. I will NEVER search it. Remove my ability to do navigate directly to the address and I think the lawyers will have a field day with everything from "unlawful taking" to "interference with prospective economic advantage" Oh - and just wait for the class actions from victims of phishing scams that could have been easily avoided!

That's like saying, remove all physical addresses and street signs from the houses and buildings and let the vehicle nav systems make their best guess at where you really intend to go.

McFly!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Ain&#8217;t gonna happen.</p>
<p>When I want IBM&#8217;s website, I will ALWAYS type ibm.com into the url box. I will NEVER search it. Remove my ability to do navigate directly to the address and I think the lawyers will have a field day with everything from &#8220;unlawful taking&#8221; to &#8220;interference with prospective economic advantage&#8221; Oh - and just wait for the class actions from victims of phishing scams that could have been easily avoided!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s like saying, remove all physical addresses and street signs from the houses and buildings and let the vehicle nav systems make their best guess at where you really intend to go.</p>
<p>McFly!!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mdoherty</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-128982</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/680/searchegnines-domainnames.html#comment-128982</guid>
					<description>I hope you are wrong but I'm glad I saw this blog. Domain names currently hold so much value it would change the face of seo if search engines discounted them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you are wrong but I&#8217;m glad I saw this blog. Domain names currently hold so much value it would change the face of seo if search engines discounted them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
