Comments on: Evaluating Web Marketing Tools http://www.johnon.com/710/seo-tools-reviewed.html I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere.... Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:02:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Keith http://www.johnon.com/710/seo-tools-reviewed.html#comment-129458 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:57:54 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/710/seo-tools-reviewed.html#comment-129458 It would be interesting to hear your views on some of the Firefox Add Ons for SEO as well as rank checking resources such as Advance Web Ranking (sister product to ALM)...we're not big fans of ranking reports but...they seem to have become an expectation from clients (which hopefully will die down when universal/personalisation/social search are fully bedded in to the SE algorithms and ranking as such becomes a lesser issue/benchmark). Not sure if you have access to some of the SEOMoz resources... <em>(sentence edited due to acknowledged potential conflict of interest - ja)</em> As always. appreciate your insightful comments and looking forward to some of your reports/analysis over the coming months. Best regards KP <em><strong>John replies:</strong></em> <em>thanks Keith. I removed the seomoz note because of your acknowledged potential conflict  of interest, thanks. Personally, I have yet to see an seomoz tool I valued above the cost of using it; a cost which includes not only the significant direct cost of subscribing, but also the indirect costs of dealing with seomoz the company. I have not had good experiences...</em> It would be interesting to hear your views on some of the Firefox Add Ons for SEO as well as rank checking resources such as Advance Web Ranking (sister product to ALM)…we’re not big fans of ranking reports but…they seem to have become an expectation from clients (which hopefully will die down when universal/personalisation/social search are fully bedded in to the SE algorithms and ranking as such becomes a lesser issue/benchmark).

Not sure if you have access to some of the SEOMoz resources… (sentence edited due to acknowledged potential conflict of interest - ja)
As always. appreciate your insightful comments and looking forward to some of your reports/analysis over the coming months.

Best regards

KP

John replies: thanks Keith. I removed the seomoz note because of your acknowledged potential conflict  of interest, thanks. Personally, I have yet to see an seomoz tool I valued above the cost of using it; a cost which includes not only the significant direct cost of subscribing, but also the indirect costs of dealing with seomoz the company. I have not had good experiences…

]]> by: Jason @ Domain Methods http://www.johnon.com/710/seo-tools-reviewed.html#comment-129446 Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:40:11 +0000 http://www.johnon.com/710/seo-tools-reviewed.html#comment-129446 Might I suggest reviewing SEO Spyglass. Its a software tool I have purchased myself and get some good use out of but i'm not sure I am truly using it to its fullest potential. Would love to hear your take on it as well if there are better alternatives. Thanks and great idea! Might I suggest reviewing SEO Spyglass. Its a software tool I have purchased myself and get some good use out of but i’m not sure I am truly using it to its fullest potential. Would love to hear your take on it as well if there are better alternatives. Thanks and great idea!

]]>