<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Closure.. will you register your code with the Borg?</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129542</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129542</guid>
					<description>Yes, Google Points. Nice and simple. But, Google will probably want that to be binary, as in  1 you're in and 0, you're out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Google Points. Nice and simple. But, Google will probably want that to be binary, as in  1 you&#8217;re in and 0, you&#8217;re out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129535</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129535</guid>
					<description>I suppose then it should be called "Google (dis)Closure"

All I want to know is if I pull my js libraries from Google, will they count it as part of my page load time? And if I get 1 Google point for hosting my js on their servers, but my local files load faster than their overloaded js servers (refer to vague, non-descript, non-committal message from Matt about how 2010 being the year of the speedy site), will I lose 1 Google point, thus negating my original point?

(Oh, and while I just made up Google points, I encourage you to spread my lies.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose then it should be called &#8220;Google (dis)Closure&#8221;</p>
<p>All I want to know is if I pull my js libraries from Google, will they count it as part of my page load time? And if I get 1 Google point for hosting my js on their servers, but my local files load faster than their overloaded js servers (refer to vague, non-descript, non-committal message from Matt about how 2010 being the year of the speedy site), will I lose 1 Google point, thus negating my original point?</p>
<p>(Oh, and while I just made up Google points, I encourage you to spread my lies.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129496</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129496</guid>
					<description>I couldn't help but smile when I read the Google Closure page...sounded just a bit too smooth, a bit to warm and fuzzy...which always makes me think "What is the underlying agenda here?" So, I guess the theory is, "If we (G) can't keep up with js "innovations" then let's encourage the developers to work within the guidlelines of what we CAN read/see."

To be frank, it's all getting a little too weird. Had an interesting dinner table discussion with a few mates last weekend that kicked off with the notion "What if Google broke one day?" Needless to say, these kind of stealth encroachments "in the interests of quality" make many people nervous. Do we really want a completely Google world?

As always John, insightful and makes one slightly paranoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t help but smile when I read the Google Closure page&#8230;sounded just a bit too smooth, a bit to warm and fuzzy&#8230;which always makes me think &#8220;What is the underlying agenda here?&#8221; So, I guess the theory is, &#8220;If we (G) can&#8217;t keep up with js &#8220;innovations&#8221; then let&#8217;s encourage the developers to work within the guidlelines of what we CAN read/see.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be frank, it&#8217;s all getting a little too weird. Had an interesting dinner table discussion with a few mates last weekend that kicked off with the notion &#8220;What if Google broke one day?&#8221; Needless to say, these kind of stealth encroachments &#8220;in the interests of quality&#8221; make many people nervous. Do we really want a completely Google world?</p>
<p>As always John, insightful and makes one slightly paranoid.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bloggind Developer</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129482</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129482</guid>
					<description>You can find more details on using Google Closure API with ASP.NET at C# Wrapper for Google Closure Compiler - http://www.bloggingdeveloper.com/post/C-Wrapper-for-Google-Closure-Compiler-Compressing-Javascript-Files-on-the-fly-with-ASPNET-and-Closure-Compiler.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can find more details on using Google Closure API with ASP.NET at C# Wrapper for Google Closure Compiler - <a href="http://www.bloggingdeveloper.com/post/C-Wrapper-for-Google-Closure-Compiler-Compressing-Javascript-Files-on-the-fly-with-ASPNET-and-Closure-Compiler.aspx" >http://www.bloggingdeveloper.com/post/C-Wrapper-for-Google-Closure-Compiler-Compressing-Javascript-Files-on-the-fly-with-ASPNET-and-Closure-Compiler.aspx</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Portson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129472</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/715/google-closure.html#comment-129472</guid>
					<description>I can't help it - Borg will always be for me that strange guys from Star Trek Next Generation - those with white skin and funny tool instead of their hands. But thinking about Google's way of treating search engine results I must say that Your post seemed to be interesting and I read almost the whole of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help it - Borg will always be for me that strange guys from Star Trek Next Generation - those with white skin and funny tool instead of their hands. But thinking about Google&#8217;s way of treating search engine results I must say that Your post seemed to be interesting and I read almost the whole of it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
