<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Page Rank Sculpting Still Doesn&#8217;t Work</title>
	<link>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html</link>
	<description>I think there's an opinion on that subject lying around here somewhere....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Capshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130918</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130918</guid>
					<description>Very well said. "This link is not trustworthy" is so obvious and hard to miss, yet many did, including myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said. &#8220;This link is not trustworthy&#8221; is so obvious and hard to miss, yet many did, including myself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ryan Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130916</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130916</guid>
					<description>". When you have a vested interest in having been right (because you have clients who paid a lot to be told to implement nofollow, and paid a lot to implement nofollow for page rank sculpting), you tend to develop a biased perspective."

Truer words were never spoken.  That's why I'm always skeptical of "research" by various SEO shops out there.  Much of it is done soley to help them sell more SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;. When you have a vested interest in having been right (because you have clients who paid a lot to be told to implement nofollow, and paid a lot to implement nofollow for page rank sculpting), you tend to develop a biased perspective.&#8221;</p>
<p>Truer words were never spoken.  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m always skeptical of &#8220;research&#8221; by various SEO shops out there.  Much of it is done soley to help them sell more SEO.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kim at Postal Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130874</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130874</guid>
					<description>Great point. The company never announces problems in the old versions until the new version is ready to hit shelves, making people have to pay out big bucks for those updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point. The company never announces problems in the old versions until the new version is ready to hit shelves, making people have to pay out big bucks for those updates.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mkassets</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130867</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130867</guid>
					<description>"Not-so-rational thinkers ... They assumed it worked on an instance of a link .... without necessarily impacting the interpreted character of the destination URL itself "

Well, if it does impact the character of the destination URL, the following question can naturally be raised: does an &lt;i&gt;external&lt;/i&gt; nofollow link do any harm? Or your post is limited to internal linking only?

There are tons of genuine nofollow links in forums, blog comments and social media that the only signal to be associated with them is that someone actually likes the site being linked to. Not to mention the sabotage possibilities that would open ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not-so-rational thinkers &#8230; They assumed it worked on an instance of a link &#8230;. without necessarily impacting the interpreted character of the destination URL itself &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, if it does impact the character of the destination URL, the following question can naturally be raised: does an <i>external</i> nofollow link do any harm? Or your post is limited to internal linking only?</p>
<p>There are tons of genuine nofollow links in forums, blog comments and social media that the only signal to be associated with them is that someone actually likes the site being linked to. Not to mention the sabotage possibilities that would open &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Profit Addiction</title>
		<link>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130865</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.johnon.com/737/pagerank-sculpting-works.html#comment-130865</guid>
					<description>When you say 'internal links' that means links to other articles within your website, right?

What is your take on nofollow for external links, like in a blogroll?

Thanks!

Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say &#8216;internal links&#8217; that means links to other articles within your website, right?</p>
<p>What is your take on nofollow for external links, like in a blogroll?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Jeremy
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
