John Andrews is a Competitive Webmaster and Search Engine Optimization Consultant in Seattle, Washington. This is John Andrews blog on issues of interest to the SEO community and competitive webmasters. Want to know more?

johnon.com  Competitive Web & SEO
December 14th, 2006 by john andrews

The Fundamentals

No, it’s not a band. It’s a set of basic elements that every web business needs to have covered. And Lee Odden does a nice job of setting them out on the YPN Signal to Noise blog this week “Getting your website noticed“.

It may seem basic, but read it again because I can guarantee even the most sophisticated marketers will be reminded of one or two aspects that have not been getting as much attention lately as they could use…

★★ Click to Share!    Digg this     Create a del.icio.us Bookmark     Add to Newsvine
December 14th, 2006 by john andrews

Google Click Fraud Subsidized by AdSense Publishers?

A Google click fraud employee has posted on his blog a correction of what Andy beal said he said:

Yesterday, Andy Beal posted a detailed story on Google and click fraud, in which I was quoted as saying that Google’s click fraud rate is less than 2%. Did I really say that? Not quite….Specifically, I never said that our click fraud rate is less than 2%

But more interesting is a comment the same Google employee made on that page (bold emphasis added):

Geoffrey you’re right, I did not provide a specific click fraud rate. We don’t have such a metric to disclose, because there’s no exact way to determine “intent” and we certainly do cast the net wide in terms of throwing out many clicks which we know have nothing to do with fraud. The total percentage of all of those clicks that we don’t charge advertisers for in this fashion is in the single digits.

Casting a wide net” and “throwing out many clicks which we know have nothing to do with fraud” is troublesome. The click fraud engineer is concerned with advertisers, so he is throwing out clicks that he knows have “nothing to do with clickfraud”. But what about publishers? If those are valid clicks, and lead to valid sales, are the publishers who sent that quality traffic through Google’s system (which resulted in sales, and profits) getting paid for those clicks? I understand from Shuman Ghosemajumder’s comment that they are not, because the advertiser is not paying for them (they were “thrown out”).

What remains unclear is whether or not Google is still paying the AdSense publisher for those clicks. If not, it seems that there is no upper limit to how wide that net might be at any given time. By casting aside clicks Google loses nothing except potential profits, which in a risk analysis were not deemed profitable. But these would be hard losses for the AdSense publishers, because there are direct costs associated with those clicks on the publisher side.

 

 

 

★★ Click to Share!    Digg this     Create a del.icio.us Bookmark     Add to Newsvine
December 13th, 2006 by john andrews

Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation (UTube.com) Hot Steamy Erotica and MORE…

A few months ago, Google bought Youtube. It was a big story, with a $1.5+ BILLION dollar transaction. Millions of people had heard of YouTube, and hundreds of thousands used it often. Now HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS would hear about YouTube. At least tens of thousands would type it into the location bar every day, to check it out. The key take-away is the word “hear”. When they heard the name YouTube, would they expect it to be at YouTube.com, or perhaps utube.com?

Domain name selection is an art and a science. When I am involved in that area of brand development (and it is an area of SEO and brand development) I try and spend considerable time in creative session with the client. I don’t believe that choosing a domain name is an executive privilege. I don’t believe it is a job for marketing. I believe, and I demonstrate in brainstorming sessions, that domain name selection is best done by a group of individuals close to the business. A team of people from marketing, operations, sales, and business operations. They all bring a perspective that mirrors part of the customer base. The cross-fertilization of ideas and perspectives that takes place in a creative session is really, really good for the domain name selection process. The good SEO adds awareness of spelling, local vernacular for the market niche, search engine quirks that come into play (synonyms, hyphenations, semantics), and a rich knowledge of Internet history both past (learn from successes and mistakes) and current (ride the trend wave). The SEO brings tools for expediting the domain discovery process, connections for buying domain names in the after market, and awareness of the various deals that can be made for already existing domains. The SEO knows how a domain will play in contextual advertising and viral marketing. The SEO knows the value of the domain name more than anyone.

It appears that Universal Tube knew none of this, and discovered the hard way what happens when someone really big operates under a similar-sounding name. But the big story here is not that UTube.com got slaughtered by 70,000 visitors per day looking for videos. The big story is that Universal Tube doesn’t know how to operate as a business in the modern Internet world. Even today, months later.

I forgive Ralph Girkins, President of Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment for his knee-jerk reaction to having his servers swamped with irrelevant web traffic. I forgive Mr. Girkins for missing his golden opportunity to bring metal tube and rollforming equipment into the modern Internet vocabulary. I can overlook how Mr. Girkins failed to see any value in branding his old style, heavy industry company as a living, breathing member of the Internet economy in the eyes of millions of “that younger generation” of workers. Those are all classic mistakes we practically expect from today’s “over 40″ business executives in all but the high tech industries. The Clue Train doesn’t stop everywhere; it is a limited access mode of transportation.

But today on ThreadWatch. TheFounder updated the audience on the UTube situation noting that not only was UTube suing YouTube, but that the UTube domain was sporting a brand new, much-improved web site, with a prominant set of text links to things like Poker, Ringtones, People, Games, Xtreme Travel, Schools, Colleges,   Skiing/Snowboarding, DVDs, Car Stuff, Dating, Sports, Get Tickets, Concerts, LimeWire, and “MORE…”. Those links are up front and center. They are also off-topic and spammy.

I cannot forgive Mr. Girkins for the bad business move of placing off-topic text links at the top of his corporate web site home page. It’s ugly, it violated best practice for virtually all web mastering, not the least of which is search engine marketing, and it further harms the Universal Tube brand. Someone hired a consultant. Someone listened to a pitch for this approach to marketing. Someone decided to do it. Bad move.

If UTube, by it’s own admission (PDF), is seeing 70,000 “unwanted” visitors per day as a result of the YouTube trademark confusion, then Mr. Girkins is presenting a set of 16 off-topic links to those visitors before offering his own (10,000 per day PDF?) customers the content they seek. For that, Mr. Girkins is earning money. How much money? Only a small fraction of incoming, homepage-landing, typo-traffic visitors click an ad. Only a small number of those click a second ad on a second, interior page. I estimate that he won’t see $300 per day.

Oh, look. I just clicked the “MORE…” link. Now I get a full page of text link ads for such things as Pamela Anderson (a porn star), PussyCat Dolls (?), Britney Spears, Angelina Jolie,  and dozens of other scantily-clad ladies and pop culture items. Keep in mind that is a page full of sponsored text links, all off-topic, hosted on the UTube.com domain. I also see a HUGE “search” bar top and bottom… and it leads to such listings as “Sex Ads…Awesome! Are you looking for sex too? This site totally has the best sex stuff I’ve seen on the web! You gotta check this out”. I kid you not. And I remind you this is content I am viewing on the Universal Tube & RollForm Equipment Corporation corporate web site.

 utube porn

 

What price, brand tarnish, Mr. Girkins?

I am willing to bet many of Universal Tube & Rollform’s accounts are large, and don’t originate on the web site. They originate on the phone, or in person, and the large accounts are actually relationship-based. And now, thanks to the not-very-wise business decisions being made, those clients have to reconsider those relationships. Is that porn on the web site? Is that online gambling being promoted on the corporate web site? Are those even legal? Do you want to be associated with that, or do you feel safe trusting the business people who chose to monetize their web site traffic by promoting soft-core porn and gambling for a few hundred bucks in advertising revenue? Religious aspects aside, I am sure that this is a very risky venture, putting such links on the home page.

Now I have avoided discussing the SEO impact of off-topic, front-and-center paid links on the corporate web site. I have avoided mention of how the additional pages of advertisements may be viewed as spam by search engines, or at least dilute the semantic focus of the UTube content. That’s all very important, and should have been addressed by the quality business and Internet consultants Mr. Girkins interviewed, but they pale in importance compared to “hot steamy erotica at UTube.com” or “Top illegal porn0graphy Sites:The best of the best sites for your ILLEGAL P0RN0GRAPHY on the web.”  That’s right. You can find all sorts of nastiness on UTube.com now.

Not wise. Not wise, at any price.

Missed opportunity. Bad business advice? I’m not sure. But it’s bad for Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation. It could have been good.

Disclaimer: The sponsored link service Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation chose to use permits almost anyone to enter almost anything into the site’s URL, and it produces a page of ads that appear to be on that topic (but really go to more general web sites like music download sites or pop-culture community sites). That’s how those P0RN0GRAPHY and “steamy erotica” pages were generated. You can have the Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation web site generates pages of ads on any topic you like, just as I did here:

Out of fairness, though, they are showing ads for Adult FriendFinder, a clearly Adult affiliate program.

★★ Click to Share!    Digg this     Create a del.icio.us Bookmark     Add to Newsvine

Competitive Webmaster

Wonder how to be more competitive at some aspect of the web? Submit your thoughts.

SEO Secret

Not Post Secret

Click HERE



about


John Andrews is a mobile web professional and competitive search engine optimzer (SEO). He's been quietly earning top rank for websites since 1997. About John

navigation

blogroll

categories

comments policy

archives

credits

Recent Posts: ★ Cloud Storage ★ Identity Poetry for Marketers ★ PR is where the Money Is ★ Google is an Addict ★ When there are no Jobs ★ Google Stifles Innovation, starts Strangling Itself ★ Flying the SEO Helicopter ★ Penguin 2.0 Forewarning Propaganda? ★ Dedicated Class “C” IP addresses for SEO ★ New Domain Extensions (gTLDs) Could Change Everything ★ Kapost Review ★ Aaron Von Frankenstein ★ 2013 is The Year of the Proxy ★ Preparing for the Google Apocalypse ★ Rank #1 in Google for Your Name (for a fee) ★ Pseudo-Random Thoughts on Search ★ Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, or a Blog ★ The BlueGlass Conference Opportunity ★ Google Execs Take a Break from Marissa Mayer, Lend Her to Yahoo! ★ Google SEO Guidelines ★ Reasons your Post-Penguin Link Building Sucks ★ Painful Example of Google’s Capricious Do Not Care Attitude ★ Seeing the Trees, but Missing the Forest ★ Search is a Task; Discovery is Fun ★ Why “dot everything” is a Good Idea (and ahead of its time) 

Subscribe

☆ about

John Andrews is a mobile web professional and competitive search engine optimzer (SEO). He's been quietly earning top rank for websites since 1997. About John

☆ navigation

  • John Andrews and Competitive Webmastering
  • E-mail Contact Form
  • What does Creativity have to do with SEO?
  • How to Kill Someone Else's AdSense Account: 10 Steps
  • Invitation to Twitter Followers
  • ...unrelated: another good movie "Clean" with Maggie Cheung
  • ...unrelated: My Hundred Dollar Mouse
  • Competitive Thinking
  • Free SEO for NYPHP PHP Talk Members
  • Smart People
  • Disclosure Statement
  • Google Sponsored SPAM
  • Blog Post ideas
  • X-Cart SEO: How to SEO the X Cart Shopping Cart
  • IncrediBill.blogspot.com
  • the nastiest bloke in seo
  • Seattle Domainers Conference
  • Import large file into MySQL : use SOURCE command
  • Vanetine's Day Gift Ideas: Chocolate Fragrance!
  • SEM Rush Keyword Research
  • ☆ blogroll

  • Bellingham SEO
  • Domain Name Consultant
  • Hans Cave Diving in Mexico
  • Healthcare Search Marketing
  • John Andrews
  • John Andrews SEO
  • SEMPDX Interview
  • SEO Quiz
  • SEO Trophy Phrases
  • SMX Search Marketing Expo
  • T.R.A.F.F.I.C. East 2007
  • TOR
  • ☆ categories

    Competition (39)
    Competitive Intelligence (15)
    Competitive Webmastering (544)
    Webmasters to Watch (4)
    domainers (63)
    Oprah (1)
    photography (3)
    Privacy (16)
    Public Relations (187)
    SEO (395)
    Client vs. SEO (2)
    Link Building (3)
    Search Engines vs. SEO (1)
    SEO SECRETS (11)
    SEO vs. SEO (1)
    ThreadWatch Watching (5)
    Silliness (24)
    Social Media (7)
    society (31)
    Uncategorized (23)

    ☆ archives

  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006