John Andrews is a Competitive Webmaster and Search Engine Optimization Consultant in Seattle, Washington. This is John Andrews blog on issues of interest to the SEO community and competitive webmasters. Want to know more?

johnon.com  Competitive Web & SEO
October 18th, 2007 by john andrews

Google Health Platform

Following Microsoft’s Health Vault, Google has announced that the Google Health Initiative at the Web Summit. As allof us involved with search already know, Google reminds us:

Google is already the starting point for a large majority of the health-related searches on the Web

Now we also hear that Googleis moving into local health commerce with “find a doctor” features:

Google has developed a prototype online platform for its health offering that incorporates personal medical records, health care-related search features, diet and exercise regimens, a localized “find a doctor” application, and other elements, Mayer confirmed. The company has shown the prototype to unspecified partners and is having both Google employees and “trusted testers” beta-test the system.

Google’s Mayer says that Google will help make sure you see even less of your doctor, as Google efficiencies help reduce the number of minutes a doctor has to provide to each patient:

“The goal for a lot of doctors is how many patients can they see in a day,” Mayer said. “That means their minutes per patient has got to go down, and the less time they have to spend finding and going over patient records the better. Ultimately we will design a product that’s useful for users, and also helps doctors do their job more quickly and more efficiently.”

Contrast this report to Microsoft’s Health Vault reporting, which was all about medical records, databases, and privacy. Where Microsoft announced the Health Vault to the world of medical consumers,it seems Google is going after industry support. No surprise there, eh?

Resources:

  • http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-health-coming-in-spring-2008/5852/
  • http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2007/10/04/microsoft-google-aetna/
  • http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2007/08/14/google-microsoft-health-care-giants/
★★ Click to Share!    Digg this     Create a del.icio.us Bookmark     Add to Newsvine
October 18th, 2007 by john andrews

Is The Web Honeymoon Almost Over?

The “honeymoon” is the initial period during which much is forgiven. The situation is new, overreaction is dangerous, and a decision was already made to “try it and see how it goes“. You aren’t usually thrust into a honeymoon — you decide to go there: you manage the risk. The web, from an SEO perspective, has been one big honeymoon. Is the honeymoon almost over?

There are many indications that the honeymoon for webmarketers has been fabulous but is finite, and it may be time to start planning the return to reality. Competition is heating up, and as I suggested in “Here Come The Domainers“, there is plenty of room topside for more competition. Post-deregulation domain prices are correcting, as the secondary market takes hold. SEO services are still hawked as “task packages” even though SEO is a process, but buyers are getting smarter. We have one search engine, and that entity has taken over almost half of the online advertising market it helped create. As Google exerts some of that power, we’re going to enjoy fewer freedoms.

One of the big areas to watch is the web development space. Most immediately, I’m seeing domainers stepping into development, and they have a lot to learn. Web development has advanced well beyond the HTML and CSS of domainer world, with frameworks and platforms evolving at breakneck speed behind the scenes. As is the case in SEO, what you read on the web does not represent state of the art or even close. Open source CMSs may look good, but they represent nothing more than a framework to adopt, often without adequate best-practice nor robust community support. Popular support is not the same as robust support. If you don’t believe me, ask how many opensource CMS adopters have read the roadmaps for the apps they adopted. Ask how many of those roadmaps acknowledge a “complete re-write” is in the near future. Too many. Can you afford to adopt a framework that is scheduled for a complete rewrite? Think of the developers… are they concerned with the current release or even the nightlies, or are they focused on the next great re-write?

I doubt very much the venture and private equity groups forming around domain portfolios are ready to swallow the salaries demanded by the capable PHP, database, and web app dev people (if they could even get heir attention). Those of us involved in web technologies have encountered those problems for years now. A hundred grand doesn’t attract who you need any more. Do domainers have the stomach to carry high-salaried technologists who are more capable of chasing the same opportunities as a technologist that they are chasing as a business? Equity is not interesting to most of the really capable people, and when equity does motivate, I find the guy evaluating the equity opportunity knows more about the web and web development than the founders, their investors, or the leads on the venture. Honestly, they are not looking so much at the equity offer, but the likelihood of their taking over the entire project or a significant portion down the road due to their virtual control over it. That does happen, just as it happens with the IP lawyers and financiers. To really succeed on the web today you need more than youthful passion and obligation-free creativity. You need wisdom, and like the really good diamonds on display in the jewelry store, wisdom’s price tag “ask for price”.

A long time ago when the web started guys like me questioned everything. It was stupid to do this, stupid to rely on that, stupid to trust this or that. But the web was in the honeymoon period, and we simply had to trust. Forget about 20 years of software business experience, we had to make progress. Client server taught us very little, because we had to have faith in the web. Now, as the honeymoon shows its age, the risks are showing more clearly. We’re seeing javascript loaded across domains, slowing down page loads sometimes at the cost of visitors, and skewing stats. We’re seeing services unable to keep up, yet still relatively unaccountable to their customers. Just yesterday an obscure blogger Earlier this month Aaron Wall wrote this:

A few weeks back I made a post about the book being a dying format, and in that post I have a Google book snippet. Within a week that snippet was broken. I had a Google CPA ad integrated into one of my major websites and the ad went away, breaking 10% of a large site and making it look like spam. Even some of the services that are not broke will likely be drastically different in a few years. Google maps is really open because they need marketshare, but after they become the clear market leader will they stay fairly open? How long until we have ads in everything? A good webmaster service that would be exceptionally useful is something that scours websites and looks for broken stuff.

Trusting Google for part of your page content and user experience? What does Google care if it fails to perform? Google maps has one of the most risky terms of service of any out there, yet young technologists forged ahead developing apps around it. They had to. But not to secure a defensible business. They did it to secure their tech positions. Now what will they do? Pitch you on developing Google maps applications using their leet skills? Are you prepared to evaluate and manage the risk associated with that Google Terms of Service which allows Google to shut you down at any time, for any reason, with no warning? the recent acquisiton of Navtech by Nokia should shake some boots. What happens to Google maps now? Or perhaps more clairvoyantly, when will Google acquire Nokia to secure navteq *and* the Gphone? Maybe it doesn’t matter for your gardening website, but if you’re Zillow, or an online yellow pages, this is quite significant.

There are plenty of signs. If you were registering domains back when they were $150 each you probably remember how stupid it seemed to pick the “authentication via email” option at the registrar. You were warned in great detail that email-based-auth was not secure, very risky, and should not be selected. Yet, what other choice did we have? It was far to difficult to manage public/private key encryption back then, and other alternatives we risky for other reasons. So in the end, virtually everyone accepted email-based-auth as the gold standard for domain registrations. And now? Because the whole system is based on an insecure protocol (email based authentication), criminals are stealing domains. The honeymoon that granted us freedom to actually choose a known-to-be-insecure option simply out of convenience, is coming to a close.
I think the honeymoon is almost over, but I also think we’re in for a wave of profit taking by the web technology people. Investors, builders, web real estate developers, and even consumers will yield to the technologists as they advance the underlying web infrastructure beyond even the rather complex levels it is at now, to levels well out of reach of most current web publishers. Innovation will get more and more expensive, and as the rest follow each other under Google’s umbrella, that innovation will yield more and more significant dividends.

Call it a bubble or call it a gold rush or a wave or trend, but the risk is increasing with that growth. Remember the old story about the guy who moved to San Francisco in 1849 to sell shovels? As we notice the new web business model evolving around a few core infrastructure players, and everyone shouts “ignore the little man behind the curtain“, who dares be Dorothy?


★★ Click to Share!    Digg this     Create a del.icio.us Bookmark     Add to Newsvine
October 15th, 2007 by john andrews

Google, Users, Domainers and SEOs

Warning: Sometimes a blog post is less an essay than stream of consciousness… and some people may get headaches from wading through such a post (see the first comment – sorry!). The rest of you have been warned. By the way, according to the wiki, “stream of consciousness” was first defined by William James, the brother of Henry James, my favorite author during my college days. William James grew up in NYC. I grew up 6 miles or so outside NYC. William James lived in the Astor house… and my family has some connections to the Astors. Funny that, eh?

If you are in SEO or SEM, a domainer or an advertiser or a big brand, no argument the future looks bright, but is is also tumultuous. Who controls the commercial future more, the domainers, the marketers, the market (users) or the search engines like Google?

The brands are the ones who spend the most on advertising, and those same brands are the ones who will eventually recognize that perfect-match domains are worth $200,000 or more. The budget-minded advertisers are buying traffic more than branding, which they can value with metrics and the buying of which they can adjust practically in real time. Two very different “markets” for the same PPC spend, and look at how they are currently bidding against each other. That can’t last (?) nor can the practically real-time management of that spend (made possible by the benevolence of the search engine/ppc provider). That can’t last either (?)

The SEO and SEM move the market, which does whatever it has been moved to do (direct traffic, search traffic, supportive cooperative promotion, etc). The SEM uses tools like PPC, while the SEO approaches the issue from a Judo-like perspective, influencing the search engine to influence the users for them. Of course they cross-over. They have to cross over.

What about domainers? They own the opportunity that exists outside of the search-controlled traffic, so obviously the future of branding involves domainers. Domainers feed a little off of search, and a little more off of SEM (SEM highlights the value of the perfect match domain, and promotions drive type in traffic to some extent). But aside from investment, the biggest influence they seem to have right now is in the traffic arena. They funnel a huge amount of advertising traffic. At the ad network’s discretion.

So in the end, who is in control? What’s the end game look like?

I think domainers recognize that they wield less influence as domainers than they do as publishers. Hence the move away from parked pages to a focus on development, which is fueled by many other factors (many of which are indirectly fueled by the same core issues of domains as advertising venues). SEM in my view has always been a tactical job, at the whim of advertising networks. SEM provides the man power and tools to utilize the ad networks efficiently, and manage the market in ways complimentary to that deployment of the advertising networks. No ad networks and SEM is “social media” and squarely in the realm of Public Relations and Advertising.

More complex tools and more need for ad networks means increasing sophistication of SEM (and increasing value added by SEM practitioners). And SEO? It’s all about search. As long as search engines are free and drive traffic, SEO will rule as much as that search-driven traffic rules. If you don’t need search referrals, you don’t need SEO.

It seems the user is in charge of the end game, no?

If users like search, SEO and SEM rule and we can expect some big changes in the way brands are competing with arbiters and others buying traffic from search engines. Domainers reap the rewards of their investments as brands buy domains, but not much reward from traffic except at the discretion of the ad networks. I doubt browser makers will continue to permit natural (type-in) traffic to find its way to the generic domains like it does now. If domainers build their own ad networks, they play traffic cop and optimize. If there’s enough traffic, will we see DNO’s (domain network optimizers) shaping the traffic funnels for optimal profits? Sure we will. The persuasion marketing people will be all over that.

If users find domains to be better than search, which would probably require a substantial adoption of good, generic and perfect-match domain names (“brands”), the publishers win the game. If YourFavoriteYellowPages became the perfect pseudo-search solution to satisfying Internet users involved in commercial transactions, who needs a search engine? Who needs more than ONE perfectly branded domain? If Google went all-paid, and users were happy, then SEO goes away, SEM becomes Advertising and PR, and domains are either everything (the brand) or a small piece (listed in the directory as a destination).

And when that happens, we shall see a renewed interest in FREE SEARCH, as people get tired of reading what MyFavoriteYellowPages says or they get tired of the way the Domain Network Optimizers keep funneling them to FriendFinder or ClassMates.com or other BigBrands. And the reason the search experience makes them happy? Because through FREE search, they find www.johnon.com and all the other “publications” that are new, fresh, interesting, or otherwise “refreshing”. When that happens, I suppose I’ll put ads onto johnon.com to try and make some pocket money.

Huh. The more things change, the more things stay the same.

★★ Click to Share!    Digg this     Create a del.icio.us Bookmark     Add to Newsvine

Competitive Webmaster

Wonder how to be more competitive at some aspect of the web? Submit your thoughts.

SEO Secret

Not Post Secret

Click HERE



about


John Andrews is a mobile web professional and competitive search engine optimzer (SEO). He's been quietly earning top rank for websites since 1997. About John

navigation

blogroll

categories

comments policy

archives

credits

Recent Posts: ★ Do you want to WIN, or just “Be the Winner”? ★ 503: GONE ★ Cloud Storage ★ Identity Poetry for Marketers ★ PR is where the Money Is ★ Google is an Addict ★ When there are no Jobs ★ Google Stifles Innovation, starts Strangling Itself ★ Flying the SEO Helicopter ★ Penguin 2.0 Forewarning Propaganda? ★ Dedicated Class “C” IP addresses for SEO ★ New Domain Extensions (gTLDs) Could Change Everything ★ Kapost Review ★ Aaron Von Frankenstein ★ 2013 is The Year of the Proxy ★ Preparing for the Google Apocalypse ★ Rank #1 in Google for Your Name (for a fee) ★ Pseudo-Random Thoughts on Search ★ Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, or a Blog ★ The BlueGlass Conference Opportunity ★ Google Execs Take a Break from Marissa Mayer, Lend Her to Yahoo! ★ Google SEO Guidelines ★ Reasons your Post-Penguin Link Building Sucks ★ Painful Example of Google’s Capricious Do Not Care Attitude ★ Seeing the Trees, but Missing the Forest 

Subscribe

☆ about

John Andrews is a mobile web professional and competitive search engine optimzer (SEO). He's been quietly earning top rank for websites since 1997. About John

☆ navigation

  • John Andrews and Competitive Webmastering
  • E-mail Contact Form
  • What does Creativity have to do with SEO?
  • How to Kill Someone Else’s AdSense Account: 10 Steps
  • Invitation to Twitter Followers
  • …unrelated: another good movie “Clean” with Maggie Cheung
  • …unrelated: My Hundred Dollar Mouse
  • Competitive Thinking
  • Free SEO for NYPHP PHP Talk Members
  • Smart People
  • Disclosure Statement
  • Google Sponsored SPAM
  • Blog Post ideas
  • X-Cart SEO: How to SEO the X Cart Shopping Cart
  • IncrediBill.blogspot.com
  • the nastiest bloke in seo
  • Seattle Domainers Conference
  • Import large file into MySQL : use SOURCE command
  • Vanetine’s Day Gift Ideas: Chocolate Fragrance!
  • SEM Rush Keyword Research
  • ☆ blogroll

  • Bellingham SEO
  • Domain Name Consultant
  • Hans Cave Diving in Mexico
  • Healthcare Search Marketing
  • John Andrews
  • John Andrews SEO
  • SEMPDX Interview
  • SEO Quiz
  • SEO Trophy Phrases
  • SMX Search Marketing Expo
  • T.R.A.F.F.I.C. East 2007
  • TOR
  • ☆ categories

    Competition (39)
    Competitive Intelligence (15)
    Competitive Webmastering (546)
    Webmasters to Watch (4)
    domainers (63)
    Oprah (1)
    photography (3)
    Privacy (16)
    Public Relations (187)
    SEO (397)
    Client vs. SEO (2)
    Link Building (3)
    Search Engines vs. SEO (1)
    SEO SECRETS (11)
    SEO vs. SEO (1)
    ThreadWatch Watching (5)
    Silliness (24)
    Social Media (7)
    society (31)
    Uncategorized (23)

    ☆ archives

  • September 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006